Skip to main content
PRIMARY-SOURCE .GOV DOCKET (FTC · SEC · FCC · FED)CORRECTIONS & RIGHT-OF-REPLY: [email protected]
Agent Frauds Institutional Regulatory SealAgent FraudsPRIMARY-SOURCE .GOV ENFORCEMENT REGISTRY & STATUTORY GAZETTE

Federal Regulators Target Unsubstantiated AI Claims, Adviser AI Washing & Cloned Robocalls

BY ELEANOR VANCE-KERR, REGULATORY FILINGS EDITOR8 VERIFIED .GOV RELEASES INDEXED

An archival primary-source docket for FinTech risk officers, compliance counsel, and financial researchers tracking U.S. FTC, SEC, FCC, FinCEN, and Federal Reserve enforcement actions. Every entry below links directly to its originating government release and records verbatim procedural posture.

Primary-Source .gov AI Enforcement Docket

Filter verified federal dockets by originating agency, verbatim procedural posture, or statutory citation.

8 of 8 .gov filings

Agency

In the Matter of DoNotPay, Inc.

U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) · 25 September 2024 · Operation AI Comply · FTC File No. 232-3042

Settled Without Admitting or Denying (Proposed Consent Order)

In its 25 September 2024 Operation AI Comply sweep, the FTC announced that DoNotPay agreed to a proposed administrative consent order resolving allegations that the company marketed "the world's first robot lawyer" as a substitute for a qualified human lawyer without testing whether its output matched human-lawyer quality. Under the proposed order ($193,000 consumer redress and mandatory limitation notices), respondent settled without admitting or denying the FTC's allegations.

Statutory Authority
Section 5(a) of the FTC Act (15 U.S.C. § 45(a))
Reported Scope / Remedy
$193,000 redress & consumer notice requirement
Substantiation takeaway: Retain empirical blind-evaluation benchmarks before claiming any automated agent substitutes for licensed legal, tax, or clinical counsel.FTC Official Release (ftc.gov · 25 Sept 2024)

FTC v. Ascend Ecom

U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) · 25 September 2024 · Operation AI Comply · Federal District Court Complaint

Alleged in Complaint (Subject to Court Determination)

According to the FTC's 25 September 2024 Operation AI Comply announcement, the Commission filed a federal civil complaint alleging that operators of Ascend Ecom extracted more than $25 million from consumers through deceptive claims that proprietary AI software would launch and run passive five-figure monthly e-commerce storefronts. Filing of a federal complaint states regulator allegations only unless and until determined by a court.

Statutory Authority
FTC Act Section 5(a) & Business Opportunity Rule (16 CFR Part 437)
Reported Scope / Remedy
Alleged consumer scheme exceeding $25,000,000
Substantiation takeaway: Written earnings disclosures and audited net-return records under 16 CFR Part 437 are mandatory prior to marketing automated storefront yields.FTC Official Release (ftc.gov · 25 Sept 2024)

FTC v. Ecommerce Empire Builders

U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) · 25 September 2024 · Operation AI Comply · Federal District Court Complaint

Alleged in Complaint (Subject to Court Determination)

As reported in the FTC's 25 September 2024 Operation AI Comply release, the Commission filed a federal civil complaint alleging that Ecommerce Empire Builders charged consumers upfront fees reaching $35,000 while making unsubstantiated Millionaire-storefront earnings claims tied to "AI-powered" e-commerce automation. Civil complaint statements constitute regulator allegations only, subject to court determination.

Statutory Authority
FTC Act Section 5(a) & Business Opportunity Rule (16 CFR Part 437)
Reported Scope / Remedy
Alleged upfront storefront fees up to $35,000
Substantiation takeaway: Marketing testimonials depicting atypical gross sales violate Section 5 unless accompanied by clear, substantiated typical net outcomes.FTC Official Release (ftc.gov · 25 Sept 2024)

FTC v. FBA Machine / Passive Scaling

U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) · 25 September 2024 · Operation AI Comply · Federal District Court Action

Alleged in Complaint (Subject to Court Determination)

Included in the FTC's 25 September 2024 Operation AI Comply announcement following an earlier June 2024 court filing, the FTC alleged that FBA Machine (formerly operating as Passive Scaling) promoted guaranteed profits from "AI-powered" automated storefronts that cost consumers more than $15.9 million. All civil complaint counts remain regulator allegations unless and until determined by the court.

Statutory Authority
FTC Act Section 5(a) & Business Opportunity Rule (16 CFR Part 437)
Reported Scope / Remedy
Alleged guaranteed-profit losses exceeding $15,900,000
Substantiation takeaway: Rebranding a business entity or DBA does not extinguish prior FTC Act or Business Opportunity Rule enforcement exposure.FTC Official Release (ftc.gov · 25 Sept 2024)

In the Matter of Rytr LLC

U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) · 25 September 2024 · Operation AI Comply · Administrative Consent Proceeding

Settled Without Admitting or Denying (Check ftc.gov Docket)

In its 25 September 2024 Operation AI Comply announcement, the FTC announced a proposed administrative consent proceeding regarding Rytr LLC's "Testimonial & Review" AI writing feature, negotiated without admitting or denying allegations. Because Commission administrative orders can be modified, set aside, or reopened, readers should inspect the official ftc.gov docket directly for dissenting statements and subsequent Commission order updates.

Statutory Authority
Section 5(a) of the FTC Act (15 U.S.C. § 45(a))
Reported Scope / Remedy
Administrative consent proceeding regarding AI review generation
Substantiation takeaway: Review product templates against 16 CFR Part 465 (FTC Consumer Reviews and Testimonials Rule) to block synthetic consumer endorsement generation.FTC Official Release & Docket (ftc.gov · 25 Sept 2024)

In the Matter of Delphia (USA) Inc.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) · 18 March 2024 · SEC Release No. IA-6573 · Press Release 2024-36

Settled Without Admitting or Denying Findings

According to SEC Press Release 2024-36 (Release No. IA-6573), the SEC entered a settled administrative order finding that registered investment adviser Delphia (USA) Inc. made unsubstantiated statements from 2019 through 2023 in Form ADV filings, press releases, and website copy claiming it incorporated collective client data into machine-learning investment algorithms. Without admitting or denying the SEC's findings, Delphia consented to a censure, a cease-and-desist order, and a $225,000 civil penalty.

Statutory Authority
Investment Advisers Act Sections 206(2), 206(4) & Rules 206(4)-1, 206(4)-7
Reported Scope / Remedy
$225,000 civil penalty, censure & cease-and-desist order
Substantiation takeaway: Synchronize Form ADV technical architecture disclosures with live production model pipelines prior to every annual filing amendment.SEC Release 2024-36 / IA-6573 (sec.gov · 18 Mar 2024)

In the Matter of Global Predictions Inc.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) · 18 March 2024 · SEC Release No. IA-6574 · Press Release 2024-36

Settled Without Admitting or Denying Findings

In SEC Press Release 2024-36 (Release No. IA-6574, 18 March 2024), the Commission announced settled Marketing Rule charges concerning unsubstantiated 2023 statements by Global Predictions Inc. claiming to be the "first regulated AI financial advisor" and advertising "expert AI-driven forecasts." Without admitting or denying the SEC's findings, Global Predictions consented to a censure, a cease-and-desist order, compliance undertakings, and a $175,000 civil penalty.

Statutory Authority
Investment Advisers Act Sections 206(2), 206(4) & Rule 206(4)-1 (Marketing Rule)
Reported Scope / Remedy
$175,000 civil penalty, censure & compliance undertakings
Substantiation takeaway: Require contemporaneous documentary proof under Rule 206(4)-1(a)(2) before publishing "first", "regulated AI", or model-forecast claims.SEC Release 2024-36 / IA-6574 (sec.gov · 18 Mar 2024)

FCC Declaratory Ruling on AI-Generated Voices in Robocalls

U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) · 8 February 2024 · CG Docket No. 02-278 · FCC 24-17

Unanimous Commission Declaratory Ruling (47 U.S.C. § 227)

On 8 February 2024, the Federal Communications Commission unanimously adopted a Declaratory Ruling in CG Docket No. 02-278 confirming that voice-cloning and AI-generated voices used in outbound telephone calls qualify as "artificial" voices under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Outbound AI voice calls initiated without prior express consent violate federal law and expose callers to statutory damages and State Attorney General injunctive actions.

Statutory Authority
Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 U.S.C. § 227(b))
Reported Scope / Remedy
Nationwide TCPA statutory liability & State AG enforcement authority
Substantiation takeaway: Log verifiable prior express written consent before deploying any automated outbound voice agent or synthetic speech dialer.FCC Official Ruling (fcc.gov · 8 Feb 2024)

Investigative Statutory Briefings & CCO Checklists

FTC Operation AI Comply Statutory & Substantiation Brief

15 U.S.C. § 45 · 16 CFR Part 437

Examines the FTC's 25 September 2024 five-action sweep, distinguishing federal district court civil complaints from Part 2 administrative consent orders and detailing pre-claim substantiation standards.

Read Brief

SEC Rule 206(4)-1 AI-Washing Enforcement & CCO Audit Checklist

17 CFR § 275.206(4)-1 · Releases IA-6573 & IA-6574

Breaks down the SEC's settled administrative orders in Delphia (USA) Inc. and Global Predictions Inc., paired with an interactive substantiation checklist for compliance teams.

Read Brief

Synthetic Identity Fraud, eCBSV & Automated Onboarding Defenses

Federal Reserve Toolkit · FinCEN Identity Advisories

Reviews manufactured SSN-profile assembly, automated bot-ring account opening, Social Security Administration eCBSV checks, cryptographic liveness, and cross-channel velocity thresholds.

Read Brief

Reviewed by Eleanor Vance-Kerr, Senior Regulatory Filings & Enforcement Editor

Verifies primary U.S. FTC, SEC, FinCEN, and Federal Reserve public enforcement releases and procedural posture citations prior to manual publication.

Last reviewed:

Reviewed every 6 months (updated promptly upon verified .gov docket changes)

AI-assistance & editorial check: Research outlining and formatting are assisted by AI tools in an offline draft workflow. Nothing on this site publishes automatically without verification. A named human editor opens and verifies every primary source link, command snippet, and factual statement prior to publication. See our Editorial Policy and Corrections Policy.

Verified Primary Sources

Save Your Email for Verified .gov Enforcement Updates

Sourced .gov AI Enforcement Registry

Opt in to receive periodic briefings when federal agencies publish new AI enforcement orders, consent decrees, or synthetic identity advisories. No emails are sent yet.

Do not enter bank, card, passport or password details.
Protected by Cloudflare Turnstile · Isolated per-site D1 (agentfrauds-leads).